• Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Podcast
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Rss this site
HMMR Media
  • Topics
    • Sprinting & Jumping
    • Throwing Events
    • Sports Science
    • Motor Learning
    • Periodization & Planning
    • Field Sports
    • Endurance Sports
    • Additional Topics
    • Browse By Author
  • Podcasts
    • HMMR Podcast
    • GAINcast
    • The Jack Skille Show
  • Classroom
    • Video Lessons
    • Training Programs
    • Movement Library
    • Online Hangouts
    • Events
  • Store
    • Books
    • Training Gear
  • Login
    • Login
    • Member Profile
    • Join
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Martin Bingisser

Identifying Talent

May 15, 2012/by Martin Bingisser

Four years ago Taylor Bush was a walk-on sprinter at the University of Arizona. Now the 22-year-old is one of the top hammer throwers in the NCAA with a personal best of 63.78 meters. In short, she is every coach’s dream. Every coach I know is looking for a way to spot the next talented athlete. But finding and measuring talent can be difficult, especially when it is hard to define. Perhaps the most highly analyzed athletes in the world are college quarterbacks. Yet as Malcolm Gladwell thoughtfully discussed several years ago, even highly trained NFL scouts spending countless hours doing tests and analyses still have a poor success rate in recognizing the next star quarterback. The book Moneyball showed other high profile sports have the same problem no matter how much they invest in the problem.

You would think athletics might be different since it looks like it relies more on physical qualities and less on strategy and skill. But talent still remains a complex combination of many factors. Some people chalk it up to natural strength or size, but it is much more than that. Strength is a key factor, and as the cliche goes size cannot be taught, but coordination, potential for improvement, and coachability all play a big factor. Environmental factors such as their family situation even play a role in determining who will be the best rather than who is the best now. Most throwing coaches I know use some form of the Max Jones Quad Test to measure and test talent. In essence this is a test of power where points are scored in four events: a 30-sprint, the overhead shot put throw, standing long jump, and standing triple jump. I was first introduced to this test during my freshman year of college by coach Glenn McAtee. But even he recognizes its shortcomings. As he told me recently “It is not very hammer specific or even throws specific. Rarely as your best throwers also your best quadrathletes. I used that because it allowed all the athletes to compete.”


lock

Sorry, this content is for members only.

Click here to get access.

 

Already a member? Login below…

Email
Password
 
Remember me (for 2 weeks)

Forgot Password





Tags: Anatoli Bondarchuk, Talent, Youth Hammer Throw
https://www.hmmrmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/TVW-Athleten_mit_Martin_Bingisser_2012.jpeg 536 800 Martin Bingisser http://www.hmmrmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/HMMR-Full-Logo400.png Martin Bingisser2012-05-15 12:55:482014-02-14 05:06:30Identifying Talent
5 replies
  1. Bosko
    Bosko says:
    May 15, 2012 at 17:39

    Physical tests that involve jumping, sprinting and similar tests can only identify athletic potential, not talent. Talent selection or identification can be (or should be) only done during the training process. In other words, get them to throw, then see what happens.

    In East Germany and Soviet union, kids were involved in various sports and activities from the very young age, where they developed the necessary physical and psychological qualities, to enter a selection process before they start specializing for the certain event. And even in such great sport systems they made mistakes. For example, Ulf Timmermann was turned away at age 13. The greatest shot putter of all times (sorry Randy) didn’t have the necessary qualities at that young age.

    And that’s one of many reasons why I would never turn down anyone.

    About hammer throw, there’s an article/transcript from 1987 EACA congress, where Bondarchuk talks about selection criteria for young hammer throwers. He mentions the ability to rotate quickly around the left foot or the left heel through push-off and swing by the right leg. He continues: “In hammer throwing the most promising athletes are those who are able to rotate quickly with a hammer of varying weight. The test for rapid rotation on the left (support) leg is considered to be the most informative
    and reliable.”

    He also mentions that they payed less attention to sprints and jumps because there’s no direct relationship between sprint speed and rotational speed.

    Identifying talent through coordination is a fine method, if you think of coordination as a broad term. Like Dietrich Harre defined it:

    “1. Combinatory ability: the ability to coordinate parts of body movements, single movements, and operations with one another in relation to a total movement of the body directed towards a given action.
    2. Orientation: the ability to analyze and change the position and movements of the body in space and time related to a defined action area. This must be done with relation to a particular objective.
    3. Differential ability: the ability to achieve a high accuracy and economy of separate body movements and mechanical phases of the total movement. This ability is related to perfecting and stabilizing technical skills and their application in competition.
    4. Sense of balance: static or dynamic equilibrium.
    5. Reactive ability: the ability to quickly initiate and perform rapid and well-directed actions following a signal.
    6. Adaptive ability: the ability to modify a sequence of actions to new conditions on observing anticipated changes in situations or to continue the sequence in another way. Precise observation of the changes in the situation and correct anticipation of the most suitable modification are important aspects of this ability.
    7. Rhythmic sense: the ability to observe the characteristic dynamical changes during a movement and to implement them during the action. This ability is… important for the quick and correct learning of skills in all the sports, particularly if the rhythmic teaching method is used. Conscious arrangements of driving and striding frequencies are important for economic movements and sound tactics for sports with a cycle of movements.”

    Sorry for the long post, I just love discussing this.

    Reply
  2. Joe Burke
    Joe Burke says:
    May 15, 2012 at 19:27

    The best hammer throwers I have coached all had two factors in common. 1. From the beginning they could feel the hammer. This isn’t measurable but watching them turn with the hammer you could see they felt the hammer forces. The second characteristic which is no doubt related to the first is they had great coordination. You could show them what you wanted done and they could reproduce the movement right away.

    The 10 second turn test is interesting. Like many coaches I don’t reject athletes. I had a 20 year Russian immigrant who wanted very much to learn how to throw hammer. It was going badly. After a couple of training sessions I gave him the 10 second turn test. He walked two steps, and fell down. He then sat on the sidelines for an hour and a half feeling sick to his stomach. I never saw him again!!!

    Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Talent is About the Future, Not the Present « G. Martin Bingisser says:
    July 7, 2013 at 09:26

    […] identification and I came away with two main conclusions: (1) talent in the hammer throw is a complex combination of factors that is hard to measure in a test; and (2) even the most straightforward test, throwing the hammer, isn’t a great predictor […]

    Reply
  2. What Doesn’t Kill You Makes You Stronger « G. Martin Bingisser says:
    October 22, 2012 at 11:50

    […] topic that has interested me a lot this year is how to identify and develop talent. Recently Vern Gambetta shared a good article on his blog about a counterintuitive article recently […]

    Reply
  3. Predicting Success of Young Champions « G. Martin Bingisser says:
    May 17, 2012 at 12:35

    […] mentioned earlier this week that talent can be hard to identify since it involves so many elements. Yesterday I thought of an even better example to prove this […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Martin Bingisser is the founder of HMMR Media, Swiss national hammer throw coach, and 11-time national champion.

» Martin’s Blog Home
» About Martin
» Archive

X Logo X Logo Followon X

Recent Posts by Martin

  • Tips on building a strong mindDecember 3, 2025 - 10:37
  • A father’s reflections on developing young athletesJune 15, 2025 - 04:03
  • Notes from the 2025 Halle throwing conferenceJune 7, 2025 - 03:49
  • Notes from the 2024 Halle throwing conferenceMay 17, 2025 - 12:23
  • Coaching lessons from the world of investingApril 17, 2025 - 10:24

Latest on HMMR Media

  • How to perform with pressureSeptember 27, 2026 - 09:06
  • HMMR Podcast Episode 328: Back on trackAugust 31, 2026 - 08:20
  • Sports Science Quarterly – Q3 2026August 16, 2026 - 07:12

Topics

Motor learning
Periodization & Planning
Sports Science
Throwing Events
Field Sports
Sprinting & Jumping
Endurance

Additional topics
Browse by Author

Podcasts

HMMR Podcast
GAINcast
The Jack Skille Show

Online Learning

HMMR Classroom

Membership

Become a member

© Copyright 2026 - HMMR Media LLC
  • Home
  • About Us / DMCA Policy
  • Login
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top