Talent is About the Future, Not the Present

Young Mary Cain has everyone talking about talent.A new Olympic cycle has begun and already the next round of young stars have emerged. In America, Mary Cain has broken nearly every single age-group middle distance and distance record in route to qualifying for the US World Championships team in the 1500m as just a youth athlete. In the UK, junior Jessica Judd blazed a sub-2 minute 800 meters to win a Diamond League race on Sunday. And in Japan, 17-year old Yoshihide Kiryu broke the world junior record over 100 meters. I get excited as excited about these athletes as the next fan, but I also get frustrated when I fear the word talent mentioned so often without the slightest pause to consider what it actually means.

Last year I spent some time looking at talent identification and I came away with two main conclusions: (1) talent in the hammer throw is a complex combination of factors that is hard to measure in a test; and (2) even the most straightforward test, throwing the hammer, isn’t a great predictor since few of the top youth and junior athletes continue on to be the best adults. But while both of these discussions try to explain why it is so hard to define talent, even I did not offer a definition of what exactly talent is.


Sorry, this content is for members only.

Click here to get access.


Already a member? Login below

Remember me (for 2 weeks)

Forgot Password

3 replies
  1. Cathy Woodruff
    Cathy Woodruff says:

    Good discussion. I coach sprinters and horizontal jumpers and whilst ability is essential in all events, the desire of the athlete, good individual training programs and coach are necessary for each athlete to continue to develop. Athletes need to be aware from the start that there is no quick way of getting to the top and that it can take several years to reach their best. Extremely important that the coach has good technical eye and injury prevention strategies


Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] ages the form of development is quite individual and influence by both genetics and planning. As I’ve written about before, Bondarchuk identifies the talented athletes as those able to lengthen the period of development […]

  2. […] were not as good as their competitors in high school, and were thus overlooked by big schools, as I’ve argued before that doesn’t mean they were less talented. The big school throwers might simply have just developed sooner, whereas many of the small school […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *