Book Review: The Olympian Manual for Strength and Size
I’ve given a teaser and interviewed the translator, but I have yet to give my own thoughts on Dr. Bondarchuk’s new book The Olympian Manual for Strength and Size. As we are sending out the pre-orders I thought it was time for me to weigh in with my thoughts. As I normally do in my book reviews, I will give an overview of the book, discuss in detail it’s organization and content, and then summarize what I like and didn’t like. If you would like to order the book, you can do so in the HMMR Media Store. As discussed below, if you order the book from HMMR Media I can also help answer some questions you might have after reading it.
This is a book about strength. Strength defined early in the book as “the ability to overcome external resistance or to counteract it through the process of physical activity.” This definition is big and broad. It involves basically everything you do with your muscles. As a coach, such a definition does not actually define anything practical. But the closer you look at strength you realize it is not just one big thing; it is a combination of smaller concepts. We move different things in different ways. Each of these things requires its own type of strength that must be developed in a specific way. While you can provide an overarching definition of strength, you cannot provide an overarching approach to strength training. That is what this book is about. It is about seeing what types of strength exists, what type(s) you need, and how to develop it.
I have posted the complete table of contents here, but to give you an idea of what the book is really about if like to walk through each chapter.
- Chapter 1 – Bondarchuk loves definitions and this first chapter is full of them. As I said above, strength is many things and he lays out all the different ways to classify strength. You can classify by specificity (look at his classic exercise classification system for more details here), the way the muscle contracts (dynamic strength vs. isometic strength), relativity (absolute vs. relative strength), and speed of movement (ranging from maximum strength to starting strength, explosive strength, and speed strength). Bondarchuk then moves on to look at different modes of training (overcoming, yielding, retaining, and combinations thereof), different zones of intensity, and methods of strength development (maximum effort, repetition, pyramid, contrast, etc.). As you can see, there is a lot to define before the work gets done. But the definitions are important: you need to know what type of strength(s) you are training for before you begin to design any type of plan.
- Chapter 2 – As he did in Transfer of Training in Sports Volume 1 and Volume 2, Bondarchuk explains the concept of transfer of training. In addition he provides some new figures. To start with he shows the correlations between exercises in the sport of weightlifting. He also does a deeper analysis of the numbers in his previous books by looking at the interrelation between non-competitive exercises for speed and power athletes. For example, he looks at the correlation between snatch and clean for a jumper.
- Chapter 3 – This is probably the most controversial chapter and I’ve taken a look at it before. In short, speed and strength are not as correlated as you might think and Bondarchuk spends this chapter looking at the connection in more detail. In the end, though, his thoughts could not be more clear:
The time it takes to perform an exercise is critical to consider in the process of sports mastery when selecting training means . . . and not drawing conclusions that absolute strength is the foundation for developing movement velocity.
- Chapter 4 – Using the information in previous chapters, Bondarchuk starts to put the elements together and recommend how you can train different types of strength. For example maximum dynamic strength requires slow twitch muscle development and therefore works best at high intensities. Isometric work can also help develop this, but is less effective in developing speed strength. There are lots of tips and even more caveats.
- Chapter 5 – This chapter provides some sample programs for developing the different forms of strength outlined in Chapter 4.
- Chapter 6 – Adaptation is the key to any type of training, so in the last chapter Bondarchuk takes a step back to look at how adaptation works and how the historical definitions of it have failed to capture its true essence. He provides some very basic examples of his periodization to help illustrate the foundation of his methods:
In the end, the process of entering sports form is completely individual when it comes to time characteristics as well as the successive order of phases of development of sport form.
What I Liked
Like many coaches, I often refer to strength as a single concept. Or, at most, I will divide it into specific and general strength. Above all this book was very useful in detailing the nuances of each type of strength. Identifying the type of strength you need for your sport is essential to any training plan. With solid examples of how to develop each type, it also gives you an idea of how to start training it. Knowing what you need is just the start, then you have to develop it.
To help connect the dots, Bondarchuk provided a lot of sample training programs. I must be honest, when I first read through them this was part of the book I didn’t like. Knowing Bondarchuk, he would never give someone a cookie cuter training plan. Instead he needs to know what someone is training for, how they adapt, and many other details. But then I realized that the plans are not necessarily to be used, they are to help understand what he is talking about. Once I realized that they became quite helpful. For example Bondarchuk mentioned in Chapter 4 that speed strength can be best developed through working at 90-100% intensities and lifting a medium intensities. This seemed to be a contradiction. But when looking at the sample programs I understood what he was talking about: effort should be 90-100% while the load should be medium. Therefore in a sprint you go at 90-100% intensity. And when lifting a medium weight, you move it with 90-100% speed.
I have trained with Bondarchuk for nearly a decade, but even then I frequently found myself having “ah-hah” moments throughout the book as I discovered the reasoning behind such topics as why we use certain intensities in training or different modes of training. For that reason alone I learned a lot from the book, but I also picked up quite a bit about how I would train someone for other sports.
What I Didn’t Like
The big knock against most Russian authors is that the text is at best dense or at worst incomprehensible. Bondarchuk has had books at both ends of those spectrums. As the translator pointed out in our interview, part of the reason is the nature of the written Russian language. But part of it is also Bondarchuk’s writing style that includes long asides and lengthy introductions. The translation in this book is pretty good at getting the general points across, but the underlying text still includes these elements and you have to work through them to get to the meat. Sections of the book also sometimes feel like a compilation of different entries on strength rather than a cohesive whole.
The editing is also not always up to par. As you might notice, my name is on the cover as an editor but in actuality I was more like a consultant on the book. I read through earlier versions to edit and provide feedback that helped put the text in context. I was not, however, given a chance to do a final edit and this shows as there are still some small typos and even a missing table.
But overall I think the heart of work is nevertheless there and content is approachable. For example, despite a long introduction about the history of theories of adaptation, the sixth chapter of the book provides the best overview of Bondarchuk’s periodization that I’ve read. In 10 pages he did as good of a job as his three-volume periodization work did. The detail is not there since it is not the topic of this book, but he still outlines how individual the approach is and gives an example of his simplest periodization method (misleadingly called “complex” periodization) to illustrate it.
I understand I also have it easy. I know Bondarchuk, I’ve trained with him, I’ve picked his brain, and before I even opened this book I had a good idea of a lot of the concepts it contained. Others might not get as much from the book as a result. But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a lot of value in the book. Therefore I would like to offer those that purchase the book from HMMR Media to contact me if you have any questions or don’t quite understand a section of the book. I will gather the most frequent questions and provide feedback on them in a future post along with translator Jake Jensen. I can’t guarantee you will understand everything in the book, but I can at least help with the process so you can get the most out of it.
How to Buy
As mentioned above, you can order the book in the HMMR Media Store.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
[…] Olympian Manual for Size and Strength – A guide to developing different types of strength. Check out a detailed review and summary of each chapter here. […]
[…] Book Review: The Olympian Manual for Size and Strength – While it is not always the easiest to interpret Bondarchuk’s books, our review of Bondarchuk’s most recent book helps out by explaining this topic and a few others. In the book Bondarchuk explains the different types of strength and how to train them. There is no one-size-fits-all approach here and maximum intensity lifting, often assumed to work for building all types of strength, is not the best method for all athletes. […]
[…] you have to execute them in the right way with the right loads. If you were able to make it through Bondarchuk’s last book, he outlines the various categories of strength such as starting strength, speed strength, maximum […]
[…] by thinking about the science of training for speed. The first was Bondarchuk’s new book which I reviewed and wrote about in regards to training for speed and training for maximum strength. I also reread […]
[…] two exercises scores.” This was in reference in Chapter 2 of Bondarchuk’s newest book (complete review here). Mladen is right: as I said above correlations alone do not prove transfer. It is not the best […]
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!