Training Talk with John Kiely (Part 1)

Back in 2012 Vern Gambetta forwarded me an article by John Kiely (full text here; comments by me here), a senior lecturer in sports performance for the Institute of Coaching and Performance at the University of Central Lancashire. In it, Kiely wrote about periodization paradigms in the 21st century pointing out features like individualization and flexibility that are the future of periodization. I couldn’t help but agree.


lock

Sorry, the rest of this article or content is available to members only.

Click here to get access immediately.

 

Already a member? Login below

Email
Password
 
Remember me (for 2 weeks)

Forgot Password


11 replies
  1. Dimitri Tsoumpas
    Dimitri Tsoumpas says:

    Sounds like a classic case of looking for the right method … The truth about sport and success is that it is all about interdependence. Lesser coaches have the capability to produce phenomenal results because they can access their athletes. Periodization is a method, it just scratches the surface – no amount of literature can encompass the human experience, that’s what living your life is for! 🙂 nice article …

    Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] much certainty in biological side of things and things tend to vary there. Recent interview with John Kiely is a gold mine for those interested in finding more in these […]

  2. […] much certainty in biological side of things and things tend to vary there. Recent interview with John Kiely is a gold mine for those interested in finding more in these […]

  3. […] also referenced John Kiely’s work on return to play. I interviewed John in September. Another leader in that field Bill Knowles, who will be at GAIN next […]

  4. […] both an academic and practitioner John Kiely talks about periodization, why the “science” behind it is hardly that, and gives […]

  5. […] starts and ends with a philosophy. As John Kiely discussed in our recent chat, coaches need to focus more on the philosophy and process than the actual plan. Dan agrees and […]

  6. […] response to Part 1 and Part 2 of our training talk with coach and academic John Kiely has been overwhelmingly […]

  7. […] Earlier this month Irish strength coach and academic John Kiely provided a biting criticism of periodization as it is known by most people. While we like to think of it as scientific, it is based on a shaky foundation that favors the plan rather than the process. You can read the critique in its entirety here. But as frustrated as Kiely is with the common talk about periodization, he is also optimistic about the way forward. When we continued our discussion, this was his main focus. […]

  8. […] The world of periodization scientific literature is a vast and bewildering world heavily influenced by old soviet systems. If you are serious about developing elite athletic performance you or your coach must be familiar with the classic material on this from the likes of Verkhoshansky, Bondarchuk, Issurin and the like. However, also recognise that using existing periodization literature as the map to achieving elite performance is like trying to understand the outside world by peering through a keyhole. Check out this awesome interview with John Kiely to understand more http://www.hmmrmedia.com/2015/08/training-talk-with-john-kiely-part-1/#. […]

  9. […] first part of the Training Talk with John Kiely on HMMR Media was excellent interview. It caused to me to reflect on what I have seen in my 45 […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *