At beginning of this year we penned our thoughts on the hamstring injury phenomena and illustrated how a reductionist approach to reducing hamstring injuries just doesn’t work. A complex problem can’t be solved by something as simple as getting stronger; it demands a more holistic interpretation. Below we turn our attention to a similar injury trend: injuries to the calf complex.Read more
Tag Archive for: Injury Prevention
Our site theme last month was the hamstring. With all of our year-end posts we did not dedicate as many new resources to the topic as we would in a normal month, but it’s about quality not quantity. Our article on a systems approach to the hamstring was one of our most popular of the last year. Below are all of our new and archived content on the topic.Read more
There is a strange phenomenon when it comes to hamstring injuries. With most other injuries, we tend to point the finger at movement. What caused an ACL tear or shoulder pain? Bad mechanics or the athlete put themselves in a bad position. But what caused the hamstring injury? Weakness most often gets the blame. Why do we think about hamstring injuries differently? Could a change in mindset help us reverse the concerning hamstring injury trends in many sports?
Systems vs reductionist thinking
For some reason we tend to take a different mindset when it comes to muscle injuries vs. joint injuries. Muscle injuries are often treated with a reductionist approach. Reductionist thinking tries to simplify the process by focusing on specific details. In this view a system is a sum of its parts, therefore fix the parts and you’ll fix the system. What part do we focus on most with muscle injuries? We focus on the part we can measure the easiest: strength. We shouldn’t forget that we need to measure what is important, rather than making something important simply because we can measure it.
A systems approach, on the other hand, takes a holistic perspective. A system is the result of how parts interact. Fixing the system is about understand and optimizing those interactions.
When it comes to the ever-growing challenge of hamstring issues a reductionist approach has taken centre stage: hamstrings are getting injured since they are too weak. The solution: make the hamstring stronger and it will no longer break. Rather than fixing the problem this has just created a paradox: we focus more and more on hamstring strength, but the problem keeps getting worse.
Systems approach to the hamstring
Reductionist thinking can work with simple problems. But complex problems and movements demand a more holistic viewpoint. If strength were the answer, then why do strong people always get hurt? More and more research has started to debunk the simple promises of the reductionist approach.
In the niche world of hammer throwing hamstring issues are not prominent, but another reductionist approach is front and center. Many hammer throwers are plagued by low back pain which the reductionist approach blames on poor core strength and stability. While many coaches still hold this view, over the years the myth of core stability has been revealed. Hammer throwers have incredibly core strength, but that doesn’t solve the problem. Why? They are often putting their bodies in awkward positions while requiring it to counter a few hundred kilos of force. Fix the movement and the pain often disappears. It’s time for a similar revolution in thought when it comes to hamstring injuries.
A systems approach would look at the hamstring in the context of the running movement. Sure, the hamstring might be too weak, but perhaps the issue is that we’re putting the hamstring in a position where it’s being required to work at sub optimal lengths. No wonder it breaks.
It’s not that we need to ignore strength. Strength is still one component, but the hamstring debate now seems to be about whether eccentric or isometric hamstring exercises are the best. Or, whether regular exposure to maximum speed sprinting is the cure. All these solutions still use a reductionist approach by focusing on a single factor. That factor might play a role, but it isn’t the solution to every problem. If running mechanics are poor, simply adding more strength or exposure to high intensity running isn’t going to solve that.
The car analogy
To help look at where the reductionist thinking falls short, let’s take it outside of a sporting context. If a car keeps getting into accidents or breaking down, what is the cause? We can’t say without knowing more, right? It could be any number of things: mechanical issues, poor tire pressure, balancing if the wheels, word down brake pads, poor handling, lack of power, etc. A reductionist approach often picks one of those reasons and focuses on it in order to prevent future accidents without ever reading the accident report.
More often than not, accidents are caused by a complex combination of factors. The driver might be distracted. Once they realize they are in a bad situation the car’s handling is a bit slow to turn away. Then they punch the gas to further evade the issue but there just isn’t enough juice to escape the situation. How do we prevent future accidents in this chaotic environment? It’s complex, but the central element of it all is the driver. The driver controls the system. Want to avoid most accidents? Become a better driver. That means increasing awareness of the surroundings, being defensive to potential threats, knowing how your car responds, and what options you have to work with. You make the system stronger, and you’ll avoid most accidents.
A case study in sprinting
Let’s now look at a systems approach in the context of a common issue with hamstring injuries in field sport athletes. It is becoming widely accepted that there are a few main contributors to soft tissue injury associated with sprinting: pelvic control across multiple planes of movement and collapse of the ankle. However, the most significant issue, especially in field sports, is excessive anterior pelvic tilt. There are a number factors why this occurs at speed. The most common being allowing the leg to spend a disproportionate amount of time behind the body – commonly known as excessive “backside mechanics.” As such, the pelvis has no option, but to rotate forward. This rotation also puts an increased pre-stretch on the hamstring and can contribute to hamstring issues. You can see this in the famous example from Peter Weyand‘s lab comparing the mechanics of a sprinter and a field sport athlete:
A systems approach, on the other hand, also looks beyond strength at improving sprint posture and motor learning. A systems approach asks: why did the athlete have poor lumbo-pelvic control in the first place? Perhaps poor foot strike and in turn, collapse at the ankle resulted in a longer ground contact time. Longer ground contact time caused the foot to trail behind the body. This then has a knock-on effect of the pelvis tilting anteriorly as the next stride begins. Clean up the foot strike and maybe the athlete is never in the compromising position in the first place. Problem solved. Correct force application = good posture. Good posture = correct force application.
Using a system approach reframes the issue, but it does not solve the problem. In the case study above we might have come to a better answer as to what caused the injury, but we are only part of the way to fixing it. The next question is how to address this in our programming and coaching. Social media is flooded with running drills and apparent solutions for these flaws. Less convincing though, is witnessing the practical applications of these solutions. More often than not it is just pseudo training activity; lots of movement without any direction. A systems approach also needs a systems solution where the training precision, intensity, and complexity are all prescribed specifically to the task at hand using sound teaching concepts.
The solution isn’t always this easy, but the example shows how a change in mindset from reductionist to systems–from muscles to movements–can help reframe the problem and open up new possible solutions. Unfortunately, we aren’t hearing this side of the discussion in the hamstring debates, but it’s time for that to change.
What is the posterior chain? Is it a meaningful term or a term of convenience without real meaning?Read more
Coaches now devote more time to recovery and injury prevention than ever before. At the same time, injury rates have climbed to historic levels in many sports. How can it be that we’re working harder to prevent injuries, but athletes continue to get hurt at increasing rates? On this week’s GAINcast we look at how the modern approach to injury prevention might actually be making things worse, and propose some new ideas for reducing injury rates.Read more
Every month we take a deep dive into the latest research in sports science. In this month’s edition we look at what coaches can learn from computer games, the importance of randomness in training, injury prevention, and eccentric training.Read more
Look around social media and you’ll find that the ankle has become the joint of the moment. Can’t squat well? Must be poor ankle mobility. Set a sprint personal best? Gotta be the ankle stiffness. There is no doubt that good ankle joint function is critical as it is one of the first joints to absorb impact in any ground-based sport. But it is also one of the most complex joints we have and, like any joint, it works in coordination with the whole body. When we look to improve ankle mobility and function we have to keep these points in focus.Read more
When it comes to mobility, Kelly Starrett is the man. The topic was almost taboo when he starting teaching the CrossFit community about it. Now he’s working with elite athletes and teams in nearly every sport around the world. On this week’s podcast he joins us to talk about how we need to reframe the conversation around mobility and rethink youth development.Read more
The GAIN Master Class Series has been going strong the last six months and we want to give you a taste of what it’s about. Our latest event last week looked at reconsidering periodization, including a top panel discussion with leading practitioners. On this week’s episode of the GAINcast, we share highlights from the panel discussion, as well as an interview with Professor Keith Baar, our next Master Class presenter. Read more
At some point in their life, nearly everyone will experience back pain. For such a widespread issue, you would think that treatment options would be pretty clear cut. But traditional approaches like improving strength, mobility, or endurance don’t show much relation to back pain. Dr. Eyal Lederman has been one of the leaders in criticizing the traditional treatment model. Lederman and athletic trainer Joe Przytula join this week’s episode for a roundtable discussion on back pain. Read more